| Home | Syllabus | Materials | Articles | Other Resources | Fantasy Theme Analysis | Teaching Philosophy | Contact |
Study Communication.Com
Some Random Thoughts about a Teaching Philosophy
The basic tenets of my teaching philosophy are creativity and discipline. I
firmly believe that without discipline there is no creativity but the discipline
must be of a special kind. What has enabled me to continue to be excited at
the prospect of teaching another section of a course after all these years is
the fact that I am usually on to some new ideas in small group communication,
communication theory or history and criticism which excite me. I try to teach
courses which allow me to insinuate those interests into the course. I often
go into a lecture with some of these new ideas on my lecture outline but without
being quite sure what I will say about them. If I can get the class to participate
with me in mulling over these notions we often discover some new things and
some new slants that make the whole thing worthwhile for me.
I try to establish a learning environment which creates norms of uncertainty
and which encourages the participants to try out new ideas or new ways of doing
something. If a student gets an idea and is excited to try it out for a paper
or a research project and then discovers that something has gone wrong and the
idea did not turn out as anticipated I try to have the student, the class, and
the instructor learn from the unexpected. In other words instead of dismay that
the effort went awry I try to have the students ask, "What can we learn
from this strange result?"
But creativity seldom strikes without preparation. Disciplined warmups and systematic
testing of the results of creativity are required for successful academic work.
I like to have students write essay questions and papers. My teaching practice
is to go over all written work with great care word-by-word if time permits
and certainly sentence by sentence. I search for clear central thesis statements,
the ability to present concepts clearly, and the overall shape of the argument.
No matter how detailed or sketchy my comments my perspective is always that
of a friend of the project.
In practice my classes succeed in exciting many students (not all). These students
provide the kind of reward which I find most satisfying. The student who gets
excited about Puritan preaching and spends a number of hours in the rare book
room at Wilson library consulting primary sources in preparing a paper is a
joy. Often my classes develop norms of great effort and high standards of work
quality. I also strive to create norms of open group discussion in my smaller
classes with widespread participation by the class members.